1009160

Course

Publishing journal articles in Business, Management and Organization Studies (Runs annually)

Faculty

Professor Robin Holt and Professor Christian Borch, both from the Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, CBS.

Course Coordinator

Professor Robin Holt

Prerequisites

Registered on PhD-programme. In order to receive the course diploma, participants have to be present during the whole course period.

Think of a paper generally accessible to others that will form the basis of group discussion on Day 1. You will be asked to talk about the choice. It does not have to be something you like, but certainly something that provokes you into thinking about the nature of academic writing and publishing.

Prior to the course starting all students will be expected to submit a written piece of work. The course is designed for PhD students embarking on writing journal articles. There is an expectation that those attending will share a piece of work, perhaps a paper in draft form, or part of a paper. It does not have to be complete but substantial enough to form the subject of constructive discussion in group work. Deadline for submission: 27 February 2019.

Aim

The aim of this course is to take participants through the process of journal publication. There are two aspects to this. First, considering the nature of academic knowledge production (using (and being used by) concepts, categories, methods etc.), and secondly the craft of writing and participating in the peer review process. As such this is not just a practical ‘how to’ course, but also requires participants to consider actively and reflexively the uses to which academic knowledge is being put, and the relational conditions of ‘its’ generation.

The intent is not just to take participants through the demands of producing written work suitable for academic publishing, but to do so having experienced critical engagement with the nature of theory, concepts, methods and claims.

Presentations from the academic lead will be used, but the emphasis will be a discursive one, involving participants in conversations, presentations and group work. Participants should come prepared to discuss not only others but their own work, and to comment in constructive and substantive debate.

Whilst quantitative work is in no way precluded and much of the course remains relevant for either qualitative and quantitative work, the discussion on the nature of knowledge production will take in ideas from philosophy, cultural theory, the humanities and technology studies. Relatedly, the academic staff teaching on the course have largely been involved in qualitative work. The emphasis will not be on the technicalities of methodological approaches or methods, but on the kind of knowledge they create - for example how hypotheses work within a wider practice of verification which, in the social sciences, can be traced back to the logical positivists, or possible sympathies between the use of narrative methods in ethnography and fiction.

Course content

As the course blends academic writing with scholarly discussion on the nature of knowledge production, dissemination and use, the content will include consideration of the following:

The craft of writing

The conditions of knowledge production in business and organization studies

The nature of a research design, or research question, or theory

What is it to claim or propose (proposition) something as being true or factual?

Research practice, academic professionalism and feelings of integrity

Crafting publishable articles – motivation, research questions, theory building, structuring

The art of reviewing and handling reviewers and editors

Understanding journals, subjects, approaches and fields

Teaching style

The form of the seminar is a combination of lectures, presentations. The academic lead is Professor Robin Holt, the past editor of the journal Organization Studies 2013-2017 and current member of the editorial board of the Academy of Management Review (2017-2020) He will be present throughout. In addition Professor Christian Borch, editor of Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, will be present during the second day to discuss differences across journals, different forms of approach, and expectations concerning the nature of knowledge and knowledge claims.

Lecture plan

Day One
10.00 – 10.20	Introductions
10.20 – 11.00	The nature of knowledge production – skepticism, explanation and critique, specifically in the field of management and organization studies. Robin Holt Constructing knowledge and the limits of knowledge Tea/Coffee
11.00 – 12.30	What is the role of an academic journal in the politics of legitimating knowledge claims? The session will begin with a talk based on experiences of editing the journal Organization Studies. It will be based around the basic question - what is a ‘good’ academic paper Discussing the structure, content and style. This session will continue with presentations then open discussion, in relation to the participant’s own papers, as well as bringing in theoretical discussions from Day One and going through examples of ‘good’ academic papers
12.30- 13.30	Lunch
13.30 – 15.30	Participants will then join in open discussion, in part based on having already been asked to think about a paper of their choice prior to the course. Consideration will be given to how the participants understand the relationship between their work, the academic journal as an institution, and the field or discipline of business and organization studies more broadly.
15.00 – 15.30	Tea/Coffee
15.30 – 17.30	Continued into group work on the making and uses of academic knowledge and what knowledge does. Participants will be encouraged to think critically about their own production of knowledge claims, on the possible uses to which these might be put and how these can be translated into, and or transformed through, the process of submission and publication.
18.30 -	Dinner
Day Two
9.00 – 11.00	Approaching journals Robin Holt and Christian Borch This session looks at the journal landscape, and how to find ways through it, without presuming an overview. This will include critical discussions of the criteria by which journals are assessed and institutional pressures by which they are framed (impact factors, downloads, sales, professionalism) and other organizational forms making up the field (publishers, learned societies, libraries, search engines). Means of getting to know journals: Special issues Reviewing The editorials Conferences and workshops
11.00 – 11.15	Tea/Coffee
11.15 - 12.30	Types of paper – essays, theory papers, empirics Robin Holt and Christian Borch Motivations for studies/papers – gap finding, problem centred research, provocation, assaying etc. Methodological approaches – how far can you stretch the criteria of meaning? The limits of text – do images have a role? Technology and academic writing – the influence of digitized systems on style and content.
12.30 - 13.30	Lunch
13.30 – 15.00	What is peer review and why do we organize scholarly life according to its standards? Robin Holt and Christian Borch This will be an explication, but also take in critique, and discuss emerging issues, including technological one’s which may change the way peer review works. Taking the participants through a real example of two papers and how they were handled in review. The intent here is to reveal the process of peer review from within. The day will end with participants presenting their own thoughts on the papers, and the effect the process of peer review has on what is written and read.
15.00 – 15.15	Tea/Coffee
15.15 - 17.00	Peer review discussion in groups continued. The iterations of each paper, the editors’ and reviewers’ comments and the replies from authors will be available.
Day Three
9.00 – 10.30	Handling the writing and peer review process continued Robin Holt (all day) Review of previous day. Reconsidering the question: What is the nature of a good paper?
10.30 - 10.45	Tea/Coffee
10.45 - 12.30	Small group work going through participants’ own papers. This will involve group work where participants read and comment constructively and critically on each other’s papers writing. The emphasis will be on engagement with the ideas, theories, problems, questions, structure, methods and so on.
12.30 - 13.30	Lunch
13.30 - 16.00	Continuing in a constructive spirit, participants will review one another’s work in groups and then present to the whole group. The expectation is that participants will review both with a mind for publication and the broader questions of knowledge production. Reviewing guides will be provided to help prompt participants in this regard.
16.00 - 17.00	Open discussion and learning points.

Learning objectives

By the end of the course participants will have a rich and full sense of how to craft a paper and why crafting such a paper might matter to others, both within and outside the academic community.

We will inquire into the different approaches researchers have used and their styles of writing and imagery.

Emphasis is placed on participants’ scholarly development as well as on their capacity to craft a paper for submission to an academic, peer-reviewed journal.

Exam

N/A

Other

Start date

13/03/2019

End date

15/03/2019

Level

PhD

ECTS

3 ECT

Language

English

Course Literature

Course participants are expected to have read selections from these sources before the course. They will also be expected to have read the papers selected by the other participants, as well as one anothers’ work from within their allotted group.

Judith Butler (2009) ‘Critique, Dissent, Disciplinarity’. Critical Inquiry 35. 773-797.

Stephen Barley (2006) ‘When I write my masterpiece: Thoughts on what makes a journal Interesting’, The Academy of Management Journal, 49(1): 16-20

Robert Chia and Robin Holt (2008) ‘On managerial knowledge’, Management Learning, 39(2): 141-158.

Gerald Davis (2014) Why do we still have journals? Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(2): 193-201

Michel Foucault (1977/1986) The Concern for Truth in Politics, Philosophy, Culture and Other Writings 1977-1984. New York: Kritzman. 255-268.

Sarah Gilmore, Nancy Harding, Jenny Helin and Alison Pullen ‘Call for Papers Special Issue of Management Learning Writing Differently’ Management Learning. January 2017.

Karin Knorr-Cetina (1981) The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. New York: Columbia University Press.

Paul Krugman ‘How I work’ The American Economist, 37(2): 25-31

Bruno Latour (1988) ’The Politics of Explanation’ in S. Woolgar (ed) Knowledge and Reflexivity. Sage. 155-176.

Martin Parker, M (2014) ‘Writing: What can be said, by who, and where?’ In Jeanes, E and Huzzard, T (eds) Critical Management Research: Reflections from the Field. London: Sage, [9 781446257432] 211-226.

Rebecca Solnit (2017) ‘From Lying to Leering.’ London Review of Books no. 39.

Robert Sutton and Barry Staw (1995) ‘What Theory is Not’, ASQ, 40, 3: 371-384.

Marina Warner (2014) Learning my lesson. London Review of Books 37(6): 8-14.
https://www.lrb.co.uk/v37/n06/marina-warner/learning-my-lesson

Virginia Woolf A Room of One’s Own. (Start of Chapter Two) http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks02/0200791.txt

Fee

DKK 3,900 (covers the course, coffee/tea, lunch and one dinner)

Minimum number of participants

Maximum number of participants

Location

Copenhagen Business School
Porcelænshaven 18A
2000 Frederiksberg
Room: 3.135 (3rd floor)

Contact information

The PhD Support
Katja Høeg Tingleff
Tel.: +45 38 15 28 39
E-mail: kht.research@cbs.dk

Registration deadline

30/01/2019

Please note that your registration is binding after the registration deadline.

In case we receive more registrations for the course than we have places, the registrations will be prioritized in the following order: Students from Doctoral School of Organisation and Management Studies (OMS), students from other CBS PhD schools, students from other institutions than CBS.

Top