Session 1: Introduction to the management of innovation (CG) Literature o Anderson, P., & Tushman, M. L. 1990. Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (4): 604-633. o Dosi, G. 1982. Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change. Research Policy, 11: 147-162. o Henderson, R., & Clark, K. B. 1990. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1): 9-30. o Pavitt, K. L. R. 1984. Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13 (6): 343-373.
Session 2: Open approaches to innovation (MP) Literature o Dahlander, L., Gann, D.M. 2010. How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6): 699-709 o Felin, T., Zenger, R.R. 2014. Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Research Policy, 43: 914-925. o Gambardella, A., Raasch, C., von Hippel, E. 2016. The user innovation paradigm: impacts on markets and welfare. Management Science, 63(5): 1450-1468 o Laursen, K., Salter, A. J. 2006. Open for Innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovative performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2): 131-150.
Session 3: Introduction to the economics of innovation (THR) Literature o Scotchmer, S. (2004): Innovation and Incentives, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, chapters 2, 4 and 6. o Choi, J. P. 2002. A Dynamic Analysis of Licensing: The ‘‘Boomerang'’ Effect and Grant-Back Clauses, International Economic Review, 43: 1468-2354. o Gallini, N. T. and B. D. Wright. 1990. Technology Transfer under Asymmetric Information, The RAND Journal of Economics, 21: 147-160.
Session 4: Platform-based innovation and innovation ecosystems (CC) Literature o To be confirmed Session 5: Networks, collaboration and alliances (KL) Literature o Teece, D.J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy. Research Policy 15: 285-305. o Mowery, D., Oxley, J., Silverman, B. 1996. Strategic Alliances and Interfirm Knowledge Transfers. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter 96 special issue): 77-91.
Ahuja, G. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes and innovation: a longitudinal study, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45 (3): 425-455. Session 6: Science, technology, and innovation policy evaluation (PH) Literature o To be confirmed
Session 7: Appropriability, markets for technology and innovation strategy (MS) Literature o Teece, D. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy. Research Policy, 15 (6): 285-305. o Levin, R., Klevorick, A., Nelson, R. R., et al. 1987. Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (3): 783-820. o Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., Gambardella, A. 2001. Markets for Technology and their Implications for Corporate Strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10 (2): 419-451. o Marx, M., Strumsky, D., Fleming, L., 2009. Mobility, skills, and the Michigan non-compete experiment. Management Science 55(6), 875-889.
Session 8: Organizational learning (JL) Literature o To be confirmed
Session 9: Employee mobility: theory and empirics (KH) Literature o Marx, M., Strumsky, D., Fleming, L. (2009). Mobility, skills, and the Michigan non-compete experiment. Management Science, 55(6), 875-889. o Groysberg, B., Lee, L. E. (2009). Hiring stars and their colleagues: Exploration and exploitation in professional service firms. Organization Science, 20(4), 740-758. o Mawdsley, J. K., Somaya, D. (2016). Employee mobility and organizational outcomes: An integrative conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Management, 42(1), 85-113.
Session 10: University-industry linkages (VT) Background literature: o Stephan, P. 1996. The Economics of Science, Journal of Economic Literature, 34(3): 1199-1235. o Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., Stein, J.C. 2008. Academic Freedom, Private-Sector Focus, and the Process of Innovation, The RAND Journal of Economics, 39(3): 617-635. Literature o Pavitt, K. 1991. What Makes Basic Research Economically Useful? Research Policy, 20: 109-119. o Jaffe, A. 1989. Real Effects of Academic Research. American Economic Review, 79(5): 957-970. Revideret den 1. februar 2012 o Agrawal, A., & Henderson, R. 2002. Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48(1), 44-60. o Bercovitz, J., Feldman, M. 2008. Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level, Organization Science, 19(1): 69-89.
|