1107381


Course
Philosophy of Science

Faculty
Hans Siggaard Jensen, Professor of Philosophy of Science, hsj@edu.au.dk

Course Coordinator
Michel Avital

Prerequisites
The course is designed for doctoral students in the humanities and social sciences at any stage of their PhD program and with any methodological and disciplinary background. There are no prerequisites for enrollment. Furthermore, the course is developed in coordination with and endorsed as a seminal course by PAC (PhD Association of CBS).

Each participant is required to submit a short paper that reflects on her or his research project and questions of philosophy of science. For example, under what assumptions is knowledge created in the project? What (if anything) is measured and how? How do you perceive your philosophical position (e.g., positivist, constructivist, structuralist, etc.)?

The paper should be approx. 4-5 pages and may reference course material, but it is not a strict requirement. The paper should also briefly describe one’s research project and state the main analytical challenge and research problem, which we will then discuss in light of the philosophy of science. Papers must be in English. The submission deadline is 31 May 2021 (one week before the beginning of the course).

Aim

Course content
This course in the philosophy of the social and human sciences provides an in-depth introduction to the underlying philosophical and methodological positions and issues in doing research in these fields. As such, it is not an introduction to specific research methodologies but an overview that will help the researcher/doctoral student attain an intellectual identity and reflect on the basic positions and understandings of the human and social sciences. The course is highly interactive and offers an opportunity for discussions on the course material and the participants’ own work.

Teaching style
The course is structured as an intensive 5-day week. The teaching style is dialogic and broken down into lectures and paper sessions, where the PhD scholars present their own projects and engage with the course material and questions of philosophy of science. The course is taught in a conversational style that evokes philosophical discussion among participants. 

The course requires a heavy reading load that is necessary to meet the learning objectives. Reading the materials beforehand and participating actively in class dialogues are essential for getting a firm grasp of the course content.

Lecture plan
Required Text
Mandatory Readings:
See the reading list below. The readings will be provided in digital form. Please plan well ahead. Additional articles and resources may be provided on a need-to basis.

Optional reference books:
Hollis, M. (1994). The philosophy of social science: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Monday
- Newman, L. (2019) Descartes’ Epistemology. . In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (1-108).
- Thornton, S. (2019). Karl Popper. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (pp. 1–40).
- Bird, A. (2018). Thomas Kuhn. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (pp. 1–44). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/confirmation/

Tuesday
- Dauenhauer, B., & Pellauer, D. (2011). Paul Ricoeur. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (pp. 1–43).
- Ramberg, B., & Gjesdal, K. (2009). Hermeneutics. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (pp. 1–39). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/hermeneutics/
- Thompson, E., & Zahavi, D. (2007). Philosophical Issues: Phenomenology. In M. Moscovitch, P. Zelazo, &E. Thompson (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness (pp. 67–87). Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.
- Glendinning, S. (2008). What is Phenomenology? Philosophy Compass, 3(1), 30–50. Retrieved from 00-philosophy compas blackwell€8-01-vol 3j.1747-9991.2007.00113.x.pdf
- Reinalter, H. (2012). Makkreel, Rudolf. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (pp. 1–39). https://doi.org/10.7767/boehlau.9783205790099.1187
- Malpas, J. (2009). Hans-Georg Gadamer. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (pp. 1–26). Beyer, C. (2013). Edmund Huserl. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9973.00225
- Phillips, J. W. (2002). Structuralism and Semiotics. In National University of Singapore (pp. 1–11). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203412688_chapter_1
- Mallon, R. (2009). Naturalistic Approaches to Social Construction. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (pp. 1–37). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/

Wednesday
- Aylesworth, G. (2015). Postmodernism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 1–40.
- Bohman, J. (2012). Critical Theory. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.187763
- Ramberg, B. (2009). Richard Rorty. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (pp. 1–28). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613951

Thursday
- Matthias, S. (2011). Scientific Explanation. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (pp. 1–78). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/
- Reiss, J., & Sprenger, J. (2014). Scientific Objectivity. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 1–74. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/confirmation/
- Schickore, J. (2014). Scientific Discovery. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139165358.008
- Føkkesdal, D. (1979). Hermeneutics and the hypothetico‐deductive method. Dialectica, 33(3–4), 319– 336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.1979.tb00759.x
- Bogen, J. (2010). Theory and Observation in Science. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (pp. 1–34). Costelloe, T. (2014). Giambattista Vico. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (pp. 1–23).
- Heath, J. (2011). Methodological Individualism. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (pp. 1–27). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/
- Woodward, J. (2013). Causation and Manipulability. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (pp. 1–46).
- Kelly, T. (2009). Evidence. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (pp. 1–58).

Friday
 Chignell, A. (2010). The Ethics of Belief. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 1–44.
- Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y
- Longino, H. (2011). The Social Dimensions of Scientific Knowledge. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (pp. 1–27). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/
- Turner, S. (2007). Merton’s “norms” in political and intellectual context. Journal of Classical Sociology, 7(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X07078034
- Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review. 24(4) P 691-710
- Flyvbjerg, B. (2004). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silberman (Eds.), Qualitative Research Practice (pp. 420–434). London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retrieved from http://flyvbjerg.plan.aau.dk/MSFiveMis9.0SageASPUBL.pdf
- Stegenga, J., & Cartwright, N. (2011). A Theory of Evidence for Evidence-Based Policy Nancy Cartwright. Proceedings of the British Academy, 171, 289–319.
- Cartwright, N., Goldfinch, A., & Howick, J. (2007). Evidence-based policy: Where is our theory of evidence? Technical Report 07/07. Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science Contingency and Dissent in Science, London School of Economics and Political Science.
- Cartwright, N., & Efstathiou, S. (2008). Evidence-based policy and its ranking schemes: So, where’s ethnography? In Conference of the Association of Social Antropologists (pp. 1–9). London. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-015-0819-z

Learning objectives
At the end of the course, students should be able to:
  • Describe the fundamental concepts and positions in the philosophy of science
  • Articulate the research implications of the various philosophical positions on science
  • Position one’s research project in the philosophy of science discourse
  • Communicate an intellectual identity that is grounded in the philosophy of science

Exam
A Pass/Fail grade will be based on individual take-home written exam. The exam will take the form of an individual 10 pages written exam that is designed to show a grasp of one or more of the issues from the course. The paper should relate to the project of the student. All work must be original material that is produced individually. The paper is due two weeks following the last session of the course. Re-take exam, if necessary, will be administered about a month later.

Other

Start date
07/06/2021

End date
11/06/2021

Level
PhD

ECTS
5

Language
English

Course Literature
Week 23 Morning 9:00 - 12:00 Afternoon 13:00-16:00
Monday
7 June
Basic concepts
From individual to collective, ontology, epistemology, and Descartes' 'I think, therefore I am.'
Two basic positions in philosophy of science
Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn.
Tuesday
8 June
Interpretation and consciousness
Hermeneutics and phenomenology.
Common philosophical positions
Positivism, constructivism, and structuralism.
Wednesday
9 June
Common philosophical positions
Critical Theory and Postmodernism.
Common philosophical positions
Pragmatism and other common views (e.g., critical realism, materialism).
Thursday
10 June
History of schools of thought
A historical overview of schools of thought in relation to philosophy.
The craft of research and philosophy of science
Explanation, objectivity, and philosophical assumptions.
Friday
11 June
Oct 2020
The craft of research and philosophy of science
Research design and methodological assumptions.
Social dimensions of scientific knowledge and ethics
KUDOS - the use of research, epistemic values and forms of knowledge.
*All daily sessions are 9:00 – 12:00 and 13:00 – 16:00 unless noted otherwise. On Wednesday, course dinner 18:00-22:00 (if surplus on course budget permits)

Fee
DKK 6.500,- (covers the course, coffee/tea, lunch)

Minimum number of participants

Maximum number of participants
0

Location
This course will take place on campus

Copenhagen Business School
Dalgas Have,second floor west wing 
Rooms DHV 2.69, 2.70 & 2.71
2000 Frederiksberg


Contact information
PhD Support
Nina Iversen
ni.research@cbs.dk
+45 3815 2475

Registration deadline
26/04/2021

Please note that your registration is binding after the registration deadline.

In case we receive more registrations for the course than we have places, the registrations will be prioritized in the following order: Students from CBS departments, students from other institutions than CBS.
Top