776869


Course
Governmentality, Neoliberalism, Economy: strategies for critiques of power

Faculty

Mitchell Dean, Professor of Public Governance, CBS

Stuart Elden, Professor, Monash University

Ute Tellmann, Fakultät Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Universität Hamburg

Kaspar Villadsen, Professor (mso), Department of Management, Politics & Philosophy, CBS, Denmark

Marius Gudmand-Høyer, Post.Doc. Scholar, Department of Management, Politics & Philosophy, CBS, Denmark


Course Coordinator
Kaspar Villadsen and Mitchell Dean

Prerequisites

Only PhD students can participate in the course.

The course requires the submission of a short paper that deals with conceptual problems or analytical designs in relation to Foucauldian inspired/governmentality studies. Furthermore, papers that apply Foucauldian concepts to empirical problems in a variety of domains are welcomed. The paper should state the theme and the analytical strategy of the PhD project and it should be approx. 5 pages. In the paper, the PhD student should state his/her main analytical challenge/concern at his/her current stage in the project.

Papers must be in English. DEADLINE is 2 December 2015.

It is a precondition for receiving the course diploma that the student attends the whole course.


Aim

The course will provide the participants with:

a) An updated introduction to key analytical concepts in the governmentality literature, and the potentials and limits of these concepts will be discussed

b) Possibilities for supplementing the governmentality approach with other analytical resources will be discussed. and

c) a discussion of Foucault’s relationship to neoliberalism and his understanding of the economy

In brief, the course aims to provide participants with a thorough understanding of the governmentality framework, that is, its analytical possibilities, its current status, and its possible directions of development with a particular emphasis on contemporary debates on neoliberalism and the economy.
 


Course content

Over the last 20 years, post-Foucauldian “governmentality studies” have come to growing prominence. These studies have been effective in critically analysing new types of liberal government, in particular by demonstrating ‘the active side of laissez faire’. They describe how the motto of ‘pulling back the state’ has been accompanied by a series of governmental strategies and technologies aimed at shaping institutions and subjects in particular ways. Perhaps most noticeably, they have presented a diagnosis of a proliferation of regimes of enterprise and accounting in new and surprising places. But a wide range of other domains have been subjected to governmentality analysis spanning from genetic screening and risk calculation, new crime prevention strategies, to health promotion by self-responsibilisation. In this respect the concepts in governmentality studies continue to constitute effective tools for critical social analysis.

Nevertheless, in recent years critical objections have been raised against the governmentality approach. It has been noted by some observers that the Foucauldian and post-structuralist language, originally used for critical academic purposes, seems to be increasingly appropriated by ‘the powers’ that were the object of such critique. Most notably, this point has been voiced (although in different versions) by Zizek, Boltanski, and Hardt & Negri. These thinkers suggest that a post-structural ’politics of difference’ increasingly seems to be an integral part of the ways, in which institutions and companies organise themselves. Contemporary liberal ways of governing have begun to speak for the dissolution of binary essentials, the destabilisation of rigid power structures, the creation of space for the subject’s self-transforming work upon itself, and so on. In light of this development, we need to think of how to revitalise the Foucauldian concepts of critique/criticism or whether we must push a critical perspective beyond Foucault. A central theme of the PhD course is the search for effective analytical strategies for critique of power (some perhaps less noticed) in the works of Foucault and other writers within and outside the governmentality tradition.

The course gives importance to the need for contextualizing both the concepts that we use for making analysis, both in terms of being aware of how concepts emerge in a particular historical-political context that shape them. We shall hence discuss how to do intellectual history on recent thinkers, including Foucault himself. Foucault's most intensive reflection on political questions was in the 1970s.  Given that the key source of his reflections here are lectures and interviews, we should attend to this reflection less as elaborated theory and more as a kind of performance in a definite context with specific interlocutors. A Foucault very different from his Anglo-American decontextualized reception as a theorist of omnipresent micro-powers emerges if we do so. There are of contemporary events and political currents: European terrorism, state socialism, French Maoism, the Iranian Revolution, the prospects of a Socialist government in France, etc. But there are specific interlocutors including his assistants (Kriegel, Ewald), seminar participants (Pasquino, Procacci, Rosanvallon), colleagues (Donzelot, Castel, Deleuze), auditors, political fractions such as the Second Left and Italian autonomist Marxists.  If statements should be read in terms of what they do as much as what they mean, then the diverse trajectories of these thinkers are also relevant to reading Foucault's political thought.


Teaching style

The course will use lectures given by specialists in the field, roundtable discussions, and presentation of papers from PhD students. Participation in the course requires a paper with an outline of PhD project or parts of the project. See more details above.


Lecture plan
Time/Period Faculty Title
7 December    
10:00 - 12:30 Kaspar Villadsen Analytical approaches in governmentality studies  
12:30 - 13:30   Lunch
13:30 - 15:00 Mitchell Dean Concepts of power in Foucault
15:00 - 17:00 Kaspar Villadsen & Mitchell Dean Papers from PhD scholars
8 December    
10:00 - 12:30 Ute Tellmann Foucault and economy
12:30 - 13:30   Lunch
13:30 - 15:00 Mitchell Dean Foucault and neoliberalism
15:00 - 17:00 Kaspar Villadsen, Ute Tellmann & Mitchell Dean Papers from PhD scholars
18:00 -   Dinner
9 December    
10:00 - 11:30 Ute Tellmann Foucault's limitations in regard to liberalism
11:30 - 13:00 Stuart Elden Foucault's institutional analysis
13:00 - 14:00   Lunch
14:00 - 15:30 Marius Gudmand-Høyer Dispositive analysis: the key concept in Foucault?
15:30 - 16:30 Kaspar Villadsen, Ute Tellmann & Mitchell Dean Papers from PhD scholars
16:30 - 17:00 Kaspar Villadsen & Mitchell Dean Concluding discussion and evaluation

Learning objectives

N/A


Exam

N/A


Other

N/A


Start date
07/12/2015

End date
09/12/2015

Level
PhD

ECTS
3

Language
English

Course Literature
Behrent, M. (2009) “Liberalism Without Humanism: Foucault and the Free Market Creed”, Modern Intellectual History, 6: 539-568.Dean, M. (2013) The Signature of Power: sovereignty, governmentality and biopolitics. Sage: London, chapters 2.3.4.Dean, M. (2014) “Michel Foucault’s ‘apology’ for neoliberalism”, Journal of Political Power 7 (3): 433-442.Dean, M. (2010) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Societies (2nd edition). London: Sage (especially Introduction to Second Edition and chapter 1).Foucault, M. (2007) Security, Territory, Population. New York: Palgrave Macmillan (especially lecture 1 & 5).Foucault, M. (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan (especially lecture 12).Deleuze, G. (1990) “Postscript on Control Societies”, in: G. Deleuze: Negotiations 1972-1990. New York: Columbia University PressKarlsen, M.P. & Villadsen, K. & (2008) "Who Should Do the Talking? The proliferation of dialogue as governmental technology", Culture & Organization, 14(4).Mirowski, P. (2012) Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste: how neoliberalism survived the financial meltdown. London: Verso, chs 2, 3.Raffnsøe, S. & Gudmand-Høyer, M. The Dispositive, Unpublished article.Tellmann, U.(2009) “Foucault and the invisible economy”, Foucault Studies 6: 5-24.Tellmann, U. (2013) “Catastrophic populations and the fear of the future: Malthus and the genealogy of liberal economy”, Theory, Culture and Society. 30 (2): 135-155.Villadsen, K. (2011) “Modern Welfare and ‘Good Old’ Philanthropy”,Public Management Review, 13(8): 1057–1075.Villadsen, K. & Wahlberg, A. (2015) ‘The Government of Life: Managing populations, health, and scarcity’, Economy and Society, 44(1).

Fee
DKK 3,900 (covers the course, coffee/tea, lunch and one dinner)

Minimum number of participants
25

Maximum number of participants
25

Location

Copenhagen Business School
Porcelænshaven 18 B
DK-2000 Frederiksberg
Room: S.023


Contact information

Katja Høeg Tingleff
kht.research@cbs.dk
Tel.: +45 38 15 28 39


Registration deadline
28/10/2015

In case we receive more registrations for the course than we have places, the registrations will be prioritized in the the following order: Students from Doctoral School of Organisation and Management Studies (OMS), students from other CBS PhD schools, students from other institutions than CBS.

Please note that your registration is binding after the registration deadline.

Top