|
|
|
|
777892
|
|
|
|
Course |
Thinking Strategy Differently: Valuation, Organization and Collective Action
|
Faculty |
Professor Martin Kornberger, CBS and Professor Robin Holt, CBS
|
Course Coordinator |
Professor Martin Kornberger
|
Prerequisites |
Participants should read all course material before the beginning of the course and reflect on how their own PhD project relates to the course readings.
A precondition for receiving the course diploma is that the student attends the whole course. In addition, students must each write a 5-page paper that reflects on the course literature in relation to their own PhD projects. The reflection paper is due 4 weeks after the course.
|
Aim |
Several conceptual trajectories will be analysed using key texts from different theory traditions, with the aim of folding them back onto strategy and, through doing so, delineating new spaces for theorizing strategy. More specifically, the objectives of the course are to: • Help to better understand strategy and strategizing from a social science perspective • Offer theoretical vantage points to critically question current strategy theory and develop alternative analytical vocabularies to understand strategy, its conceptual relations and effects in practice • Provide constructive feedback for the students’ PhD projects
|
Course content |
PhD students of organizational life can hardly avoid encountering notions of strategy in their theoretical and empirical work: strategies provide scripts for organizational action, strategizing encompasses diverse sets of organizational practices, and strategic events, objects and technologies imply sometimes fundamental change.
Yet, despite a growing body of research that understand strategy from a broadly social science perspective (most notably the strategy as practice approach), there are still many open question in regards to how strategy can be conceptualized, how it can be analysed in relation to organization, and how its effects can be theorized.
This PhD course engages in a critical reading of current strategy scholarship and explores in how far research from related fields (organizational theory, practice theory, valuation studies, etc.) can provide answers to the questions.
The course is organized into four distinct conversations that reflect on recent developments in the field of strategy with the aim to question their assumptions and develop new analytical perspectives:
- Moments of strategy thought: in this first part the course will critically reflect on the conceptual and analytical vocabulary that traditional strategy research has produced over the past decade.
- Social science and practice perspective on strategy: this session aims at broadening the vocabulary of strategy research and introduces some key texts to the debate. The afternoon focuses on strategy as practice which offers itself as platform for more critical and social science oriented strategy research. We will discuss key contributions and elaborate on their strengths and weaknesses.
- Strategy and value: it is a commonplace to state that strategy is about value creation; yet, ironically, strategy theory does not have an elaborate concept of value. Building on the rapidly growing field of valuation studies, the relation between strategy and value will be explored.
- Strategy and collective action: The last conversation in the course will revolve around mobilization, movements and forms of collective action (mediated by technology) that have potentially important implication but are to date not part of strategy’s analytical vocabulary.
|
Teaching style |
The course is organised as a 4 day learning experience. The pedagogy includes teacher and student-presentations, break-out sessions, “PhD trouble shooting” sessions (a short on-demand session focused on a specific problem or challenge one of the participants encounters in their PhD work which might be relevant to others) and intensive reading and discussion of texts. The pedagogical approach reflects that a productive learning experience is co-created; hence, students will be invited to mobilize their knowledge (their PhD research) in relation to not just the texts but also in relation to their colleagues work. This interactive learning experience is complemented by concise input and guidance of debates by faculty.
The students are required to write a 5-page paper that reflects on the course literature in relation to their own PhD projects. The reflection paper is due 4 weeks after the course.
|
Lecture plan |
Day 1: Moments of strategic thought: the evolution of strategy as discipline in four acts
10.00 – 10.30 Coffe/tea
10.30 – 11.00 Welcome and introduction
11.00 – 12.00 Point of departure: key moments in the development of strategic thinking (Group work, max 3 people / group) and plenary discussion lead by faculty (Porter, 1979; Prahalad and Hamel, 1990; Mintzberg, 1987; Norman and Ramirez, 1993)
12.00-12.45 Discussion and reflection lead by faculty
12.45-13.30 Lunch
13.30-15.00 Group Work (max 3 people/group) on using strategy in PhD projects; exercise 'strategy tasting¨'; plenary discussion lead by faculty
15.00-15.30 Break
15.30-16.00 Reflection: mapping contours of strategic thought (and what remains outside) of individual PhD projects
16.00-17.00 Trouble shooting session I
18.00-21.00 Dinner
Day 2: Strategy, organizing and practice
08.45 – 09.00 Coffee/ tea
09.00 – 09.15 Learning points
09.15 – 10.30 Broadening strategy’s agenda: group work (max 3 people / group) and plenary discussion lead by faculty (Knights and Morgan, 1991; Oakes et al., 1998; Rao et al. 2003)
10.30-11.00 Break
11.00-12.30 Theory input& discussion: strategy as practice
12.30 - 13.30 Lunch
13.30 - 15.00 Strategy as practice; input and group work (max 3 people / group) and plenary discussion lead by faculty (Chia and Holt, 2009 (chapter 3 only); Jarzabkowski and Seidl, 2008; Kornberger and Clegg, 2011; Gomez and Bouty, 2011; Kaplan, 2011)
15.00-15.30 Break
15.30-16.00 Implications, applications: folding organization and practice on strategy in PhD projects
16.00-17.00 Trouble shooting session II
Day 3: Strategy and value
08.45 – 09.00 Coffee/ tea
09.00 – 09.15 Learning points
09.15 – 10.30 Group work (max 3 people / group) and plenary discussion lead by faculty (Espeland and Sauder, 2007; Pollock and D’Adderio, 2012; Kornberger, 2015)
10.30-11.00 Break
11.00-12.30 Theory input& discussion: Strategy and value 12.30 - 13.30 Lunch
13.30 - 15.00 Valuation, judgement, calculation: Group work (max 3 people / group) and plenary discussion lead by faculty (Holt, forthcoming; Karpik, 2010, chapter 1 only)
15.00-15.30 Break
15.30-16.00 Implications, applications: folding valuation on strategy in PhD projects
16.00-17.00 Trouble shooting session II
Day 4: Strategy, power and collective action
08.45 – 09.00 Coffee/ tea
09.00 – 09.15 Learning points
09.15 – 10.30 Group work (max 3 people / group) and plenary discussion lead by faculty (Becker, 1974; Latour, 1986; Miller and Rose, 1990; Callon and Law, 1997)
10.30-11.00 Break
11.00-12.30 Theory input / discussion: Strategy and collective action 12.30 - 13.30 Lunch
13.30 - 15.00 Group work (max 3 people / group), individual reflection and plenary discussion lead by faculty
15.00-15.30 Break
15.30-16.00 Implications, applications: folding collective action on strategy in PhD projects
16.00-17.00 Reflections, feedback and closing of event
|
Learning objectives |
The students are expected to understand, discuss and reflect upon the course literature and topics for discussion and gain inspiration for their PhD work.
|
Exam |
N/A
|
Other |
|
Start date |
11/04/2016
|
End date |
14/04/2016
|
Level |
PhD
|
ECTS |
4
|
Language |
English
|
Course Literature |
Becker, H. S. (1974). Art as collective action. American Sociological Review, 767-776.Callon, M., & Law, J. (1997). After the individual in society: Lessons on collectivity from science, technology and society. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 165-182.Chia, R., & Holt, R. (2009). Strategy without design: The silent efficacy of indirect action. Cambridge University Press (chapter 3 only).Espeland W. and Sauder, M., (2007) Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1): 1-40Fourcade, M. (2011). Cents and Sensibility: Economic Valuation and the Nature of “Nature”. American Journal of Sociology, 116(6), 1721-77.Gomez, M. L., & Bouty, I. (2011). The emergence of an influential practice: food for thought. Organization studies, 32(7), 921-940.Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard business review, 68(3), 79-91.Jarzabkowski, P., & Seidl, D. (2008). The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy. Organization Studies, 29(11), 1391-1426.Kaplan, 2011;Kaplan, S. (2011). Strategy and PowerPoint: An inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making. Organization Science, 22(2), 320-346.Karpik, L. (2010). Valuing the unique: The economics of singularities. Princeton: Princeton University Press (chapter 1 only).Knights, D., and Morgan, G. (1991). Corporate strategy, organizations, and subjectivity: A critique. Organization studies, 12(2), 251-273.Kornberger, M. (2015), Making Strategy Count: Rethinking Value in Strategy Research, working paperKornberger, M., & Clegg, S. (2011). Strategy as performative practice The case of Sydney 2030. Strategic Organization, 9(2), 136-162.Latour, B. (1986). Visualization and cognition. Knowledge and society, 6, 1-40.Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1990). Governing economic life. Economy and society, 19(1), 1-31.Mintzberg, H. (1987). Crafting strategy. Harvard Business Review, pp. 66-75) Press.Norman, R. and Ramírez, R. (1993) From Value Chain to Value Constellation: Designing Interactive Strategy. Harvard Business Review. 71(4), 65-77Oakes, L. S., Townley, B., & Cooper, D. J. (1998). Business planning as pedagogy: Language and control in a changing institutional field. Administrative Science Quarterly, 257-292.Pollock, N., and D’Adderio, L. (2012). Give me a two-by-two matrix and I will create the market: Rankings, graphic visualisations and sociomateriality. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 37(8): 565-584Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review 21-38Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional Change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle Cuisine as an Identity Movement in French Gastronomy1. American journal of sociology, 108(4), 795-843.
|
Fee |
DKK 5,200 (covers the course, coffee, tea, lunch and one dinner
|
Minimum number of participants |
12
|
|
|
|
Maximum number of participants |
18
|
Location |
Copenhagen Business School Kilevej 14 A DK-2000 Frederiksberg Room: K4.74 (4th floor) (Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday), K3.41 (3rd floor) (Thursday)
|
Contact information |
The PhD Support Katja Høeg Tingleff kht.research@cbs.dk Tel.: +45 38 15 28 39
|
Registration deadline |
29/02/2016
|
|
In case we receive more registrations for the course than we have places, the registrations will be prioritized in the the following order: Students from Doctoral School of Organisation and Management Studies (OMS), students from other CBS PhD schools, students from other institutions than CBS.
Please note that your registration is binding after the registration deadline.
|
|