808980


Course
Perspectives in Organizational Analysis

Faculty
Paul du Gay, Martin Kornberger, Anne Reff Pedersen, Majken Schultz, Morten Thanning Vendelø, Signe Vikkelsø, and Susanne Boch Waldorff; all from the Department of Organization, CBS

Course Coordinator
Susanne Boch Waldorff and Morten Thanning Vendelø

Prerequisites
The PhD students must submit a five-page paper in which they choose and relate two perspectives from the course literature to their research project. The paper must include specific references to the literature applied. Deadline for submission of presentations is Friday 11 November 2016.

The student papers serve as input to discussion during the course, and the students must participate in group discussions of other papers.

It is a precondition for receiving the course diploma that the student attends the whole course.

Aim

This course introduces PhD students to a set of analytical perspectives, which are well-alive in contemporary organizational analysis, such as; Actor-Network Theory, New Institutional Theory, the Sense-Making Perspective, the Narrative Perspective, Organizational Identity and Strategy as Practice.

The core idea of the course is to give the PhD-students an opportunity to work with a variety of perspectives in organizational analysis, and engage in discussions of contemporary research and concepts within this field.


Course content

Our ambition is to enable PhD students to mobilize different analytical perspectives in organizational theory and inspire them to ‘see’ something different and new in their own empirical work. Thus, the course seeks to increase participant’s reflexivity on the role of theories in ‘making objects for research’.

The course will enable PhD students to work with theories as ‘tools’ for making research and empirical inquiries. However, theories are not innocent or neutral. They form and frame the phenomena being studied. Theories frame phenomena because they depict certain properties of entities as central (actors, decisions, meanings, and organizations), certain relations, certain developmental processes, and certain causalities (linear or non-linear). It is critical to understand how the choice of theory for organizational studies highlights certain entities and processes, while others fade.

The observer and the object are not separate but co-produced in the research process, and the empirical data are not just ‘given out there’, as the researchers’ empirical data are constructed through selection and edited based on the theoretical tools mobilized. Theories are not considered as something that has to be ‘proven’, but more as resources for ‘seeing, discussing, imagining’ interesting properties of the phenomena studied.

Theories are devices for making sense of phenomena – and at the same time the empirical field is a not a passive thing, because how researchers engage in an empirical field also shapes how they come to ‘see and understand’ phenomena.

The course will be explicit about how this new understanding can be linked to your own projects.


Teaching style
Dialogue lectures and group discussions.

Lecture plan

Every day from 9 am - 4.30 pm (Friday from 9 am - 1 pm)

Monday: Introduction (Susanne Boch Waldorff & Morten Thanning Vendelø), Bureaucracy as Organizational Structure (Paul du Gay) and Designing and Organizing (Signe Vikkelsø).

Tuesday: Neo-institutional theory (Susanne Boch Waldorff) and The Sense-making Perspective (Morten Thanning Vendelø).

Wednesday: Organizational Identity (Majken Schultz) and The Narrative Perspective (Anne Reff Pedersen)

Thursday: Actor-Network Theory (NN) and Strategy as Practice (Martin Kornberger)

Friday: How theories define and privilege certain ways to understand and study organizations (Susanne Boch Waldorff & Morten Thanning Vendelø)


Learning objectives

• Learn how the choice of theory for organizational analysis brings certain entities and processes into the foreground while others recede into the background.

• Learn that the observer and the object are not separate but co-produced in the research process, and the empirical data are not just ‘given out there’.

• The course will increase participant’s reflexivity on the role of theories in ‘making objects for research’.
and group discussions


Exam
N/A

Other
N/A

Start date
21/11/2016

End date
25/11/2016

Level
PhD

ECTS
5

Language
English

Course Literature
Tentative literature:Brown, W. (1965) ’Informal Organization?’, in W. Brown & E. Jaques Glacier Project Papers London: Heineman Educational Books, 144-62du Gay, P. (2015) 'Organization (Theory) As a Way of Life', in Journal of Cultural Economy 8(4), 399-417.Gabriel, Y.(1995) The Unmanaged Organization: Stories, Fantasies and Subjectivity. Organization Studies 16(3): 477-501.Gioia, D. & Hamilton, A. (2016) Great Debates in Organizational Identity Study. In (eds) Pratt, M., Schultz, M., Ashforth, B., & Ravasi, D. Handbook of Organizational Identity. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Glynn, M.A. (2000) When Cymbals Become Symbols. Organization Science 11(3): 285–298.Humle, D.M. & Pedersen, A.R. (2014) Fragmented work stories: Developing an antenarrative approach by discontinuity, tensions and editing. Management Learning ,1–16.Kaplan, S. (2011) Strategy and PowerPoint: An Inquiry into the Epistemic Culture and Machinery of Strategy Making. Organization Science 22(2): 320-346.Kornberger, M, & Clegg, S. (2011) Strategy as performative practice: The case
of Sydney 2030. Strategic Organization 9(2): 136–162.Latour, B. (1991) Technology is Society Made Durable. In In J. Law (editor) A Sociology of Monsters Essays on Power, Technology and Domination,Sociological Review Monograph N°38, 103-132.Latour, B. (2011) ‘What’s the Story?`? Organization as a Mode of Existence. In Passoth, Jan-Hendrik, Birgit Peuker and Michael Schillmeier, Agency without Actors? New Approaches to Collective Action. London: Routledge, 164-177Maitlis, S., & Sonenshein, S. (2010) Sensemaking in Crisis and Change: Inspiration and Insights from Weick (1988). Journal of Management Studies, 47(3): 551-580.Meyer, R., & Höllerer, M. (2014) Does Institutional Theory Need Redirecting. Journal of Management Studies, 51(7): 1221-1233.Pedersen, A. R. (2009) Moving Away from Chronological Time: Introducing the Shadows of Time and Chronotopes as New Understandings of Narrative Time. Organization, 16(3): 389-406.Perrow, C. (1986) 'Why Bureaucracy?', Chapter 1 in Complex Organizations.Sahlin. K., & Wedlin. L. (2008) Circulating Ideas: Imitation, Translation and Editing. In: R. Greenwood, C,Oliver, K., Sahlin & R. Suddaby (eds.). Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 218-242.Schultz, M. & Hernes, T. (2013) A Temporal Perspective on Organizational Identity. Organization Science, 24(1): 1-21.Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal-Getting. Human Relations, 4(1): 3-38.Waldorff, S. B., Reay, T., & Goodrick, E. (2013) A Tale of Two Countries: How Different Constellations of Logics Impact Action. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 39: 99-129.Weber, K. & Dacin, T. (2011) The cultural construction organizational life: Introduction to the special issue; Organization Science, 22(2): 287–298.Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005) Organizing in the Process of Sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4): 409-421.

Fee
DKK 6.500 (covers the course, coffee/tea, lunch and one dinner)

Minimum number of participants
15

Maximum number of participants
20

Location
Copenhagen Business School
Kilevej 14 A, 4th floor
DK-2000 Frederiksberg
Room: K4.74

Contact information
PhD Support
Katja Høeg Tingleff
Tel: +45 38 15 28 39
E-mail: kht.research@cbs.dk

Registration deadline
10/10/2016

Please note that your registration is binding after the registration deadline.

In case we receive more registrations for the course than we have places, priority will be given to PhD students from Doctoral School of Organisation and Management Studies (OMS), and then to students who are 1.5 year or less into the PhD study.
Top