READINGS
1.Philosophical Foundations of Social Research Pre-reading •Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. Sage: London, chap. 1-3. •Madill, A., Jordan, A., & Shirley, C. (2000). “Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: Realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies,” British Journal of Psychology, 91(1), 1-20. •Ringberg, Torsten and Markus Reihlen, (Sept 2008). “Toward a Socio-Cognitive Approach to Knowledge Transfer” in Journal of Management Studies Vol. 45 No 5, pp. 912-935. •Reihlen, M.; Klaas-Wissing, Th; Ringberg, T. (2007) “Metatheories in Management Studies: Reflections upon Individualism, Holism, and Systemism,” in M@n@gement, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 49-69. Complementary Reading •Crotty, M. (1998) The foundations of social research. Meaning and perspective in the research process, Sage: London, chap. 1. •Morgan, G.; Smircich, L. (1980) “The Case for Qualitative Research,” in Academy of Management Review, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 491-500. •Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. Sage: London. •Bryman, A.; Bell, E. (2003) Business research methods, Oxford: Oxford University Press. •Crotty, M. (1998) The foundations of social research. Meaning and perspective in the research process, Sage: London. •Bunge, M. (1996) Finding philosophy in social science, New Haven: Yale University Press. •Kuhn, T. (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd ed., Chicago University Press: Chicago. 2.Qualitative Research: Design and Approaches Pre-reading •Locke, K. and Golden-Biddle, K. (2004) An introduction to qualitative research: its potential for industrial and organizational psychology, in Rogelberg, S. G.: Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology. •Maxwell, J. A. (2008). Designing a Qualitative Study, in The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods, 2, 214-253. •Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2010). “Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: myths and strategies,” International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(11), 1451-1458. •Reihlen, Markus and Torsten Ringberg (2013) “Uncertainty, pluralism, and the knowledge-based theory of the firm: From J.-C. Spender’s contribution to a socio-cognitive approach,” in European Management Journal, Vol. 31. Issue 6 pp.706-716. Complementary Reading •Alvesson, M.; Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research (2 ed.). London: Sage. •Alvesson, M.; Kärreman, D. (2011) Qualitative research and theory development: Mystery as method. London: Sage. •Antegy, Michael (2013) “Relaxing the Taboo on Telling Our Own Stories: Upholding Professional Distance and Personal Involvement,” Organization Science, 24(4), 1277-1290. •Denzin, N. K. and Y. S. Lincoln (2000) Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, Calif., Sage Publications. •Flick, Uwe; von Kardorff, Ernst; Steinke, Ines (Eds.) (2004) A companion to qualitative research, Sage: London. •Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice, Routledge. •Guba, E. G. (1981) “Criteria for Assessing the Trustworthiness of Naturalistic Inquiries,” ECTJ, 29(2): 75-91. •Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. New York: Sage. •Maxwell, J. A. (2012). A realist approach for qualitative research, Sage: London. •Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook, Sage: London. •Smets, M.; Burke, G.; Jarzabkowski, P. (2014) “Charting new territory for organizational ethnography: Insights from a team-based video ethnography,” Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 3(1):10-26. 3. Design and Method of Case Study Research Pre-reading •Dyer, W.G.; Wilkins, A.L. (1991), ‘Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, To Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt’, Academy of Management Review, 16, 3, pp. 613-619. •Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989), “Building theories from case study research,”Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, S. 532–550. •Yin, K.R. (2003) Case study research: Design and Methods – Third Edition, Thousand Oaks, pp. 1-56. •Reihlen, Markus and Torsten Ringberg, (2006) "Computer-mediated knowledge systems in consultancy firms: do they work?" Professional Service Firms; Royston Greenwood and Toy Sudderby (eds.), in Research in Sociology of Organizations. Vol. 24, pp. 307-336. (annual volume/periodical). •Anteby, M. (2013). Perspective. “Relaxing the taboo on telling our own stories: Upholding professional distance and personal involvement.” Organization Science, 24(4), 1277-1290.
Complementary Reading •Eisenhardt, K. und Graebner, M. E. (2007): “Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges,” in Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1: 25-32 •Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W., & Wicki, B. (2008). “What passes as a rigorous case study?” Strategic Management Journal, 29(13), 1465-1474. •Langley, A. (1999). “Strategies for theorizing from process data,” in Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691-710. Burawoy, M. (1998), The Extended Case Method, Sociological Theory, 16, 1, pp. 4-33. •Ragin, CC. (1997) Turning the Tables: How Case-Oriented Research Challenges Variable-Oriented Research, Comparative Social Research, 16, 27-42. 5. Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique (ZMET) & Ethnography Pre-reading Zaltman •Alvesson, M. (2003). “Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: A reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research,” in Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 13-36. •Zaltman, G.; Coulter, R. H. 1995. “Seeing the voice of the customer: Metaphor-based advertising research,” Journal of Advertising Research, 35(4): 35-51. •Ryden, P., Ringberg, T. and Wilke, R. (2015), “The influence of Mental Models of Business- Consumer Interaction on Social Media Use” in Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 31, August, pp 1-16. •Ringberg, T and Gupta, S. (2003), “The Importance of Understanding the Symbolic World of Customers in Asymmetric Business-to-Business Relationships,” in Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, Special Issue on Qualitative Approaches in B-2-B. Vol. 18 No 6/7. Pp. 607-626. Complementary Reading ZMET •Alvesson, M. (2011). Interpreting interviews. Los Angeles ; London: Sage. •Zaltman, Gerald (2003). How customers think: Essential insights into the mind of the market. Harvard Business School Press: Cambridge. Pre-reading Ethnography •Smets, M.; Burke, G.; Jarzabkowski, P. (2014) Charting new territory for organizational ethnography: Insights from a team- based video ethnography, Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 3(1), pp.10-26. •Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. Routledge, Chap. 1. •Sandikci, Özlem and Güliz Ger (2010)” Veiling in Style: How Does a Stigmatized Practice Become Fashionable?” in Journal of Consumer Research (Jun) Vol. 37 Issue 1, p15-36. Complementary Readings Ethnography •Antegy, Michael (forthcoming) Relaxing the Taboo on Telling Our Own Stories: Upholding Professional Distance and Personal Involvement, Organization Science. •Alvesson, M.; Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research (2 ed.). London: SAGE. •Guba, E. G. (1981) Criteria for Assessing the Trustworthiness of Naturalistic Inquiries, ECTJ, 29(2): 75-91. •Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. New York: Sage. 6. Grounded Theory Pre-reading •Bryant, Antony; Charmaz, Kathy (2007) Introduction - Grounded theory research methods: Methods and practices, in The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, edited by Bryant, Antony; Charmaz, Kathy, Sage: London, pp. 2-28. •Corbin, Juliet; Strauss, Anselm (1990) Grounded Theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative Criteria, Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 19 (6), 418-427. •Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). “Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research notes on the Gioia methodology.” Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15-31. •Orton, J. D. (1997). “From inductive to iterative grounded theory: Zipping the gap between process theory and process data,” Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(4), 419-438. •Strauss, A.; Corbin, J. (1998): Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd ed., Sage: Thousand Oaks. •Suddaby, R. (2006) What grounded theory is not. In Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 633-642. Complementary Reading •Bryant, A.; Charmaz, K. (Eds.) (2007) The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory, Sage: Thousand Oaks. •Glaser, B.; Strauss, A. (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Aldine, Chicago. •Glaser, B. G. 1992. Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, California: Sociology Press. •Jones,, R.; Noble, G. (2007) “Grounded theory and management research: a lack of integrity?” In Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management Vol. 2, No. 2, p: 84-103 •O¹Reilly, K., Paper, D., & Marx, S.(2012). Demystifying grounded theory for business research. Organizational Research Methods, 15(2), 247-262. •Locke, K. (2001): Grounded theory in management research, London: Sage •Miles, M.B.; Huberman, M.A. (1994): Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, 2nd. ed., Thousand Oaks: Sage. On qualitative meta-studies •Bronstein Bejarano, J., & Reihlen, M. (2014). „Entrepreneurial university archetypes: A meta-synthesis of case study literature,” Industry and Higher Education, 28(4), 245–262. •Hoon, C. (2013), “Meta-synthesis of qualitative case studies: an approach to theory building,” Organizational Research Methods, 16(4): 522–556. •Rauch, A., Doorn, R., and Hulsink, W. (2014), “A qualitative approach to evidence-based entrepreneurship: theoretical considerations and an example involving business clusters,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2): 333–368. 9. Writing Qualitative Research Papers: Learning from Examples Pre-reading •Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). “Generating research questions through problematization,” Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247-271. •Corley, K. G. (2011). “The coming of age for qualitative research: Embracing the diversity of qualitative methods,” Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 233-237. •Ragins, B. R. (2012). “Reflections on the craft of clear writing,” Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 493-501. •Luna, David, Torsten Ringberg, and Laura Peracchio (2008), “One Individual, Two Identities: Frame Switching Among Biculturals,” in Journal of Consumer Research Vol. 35, No 2, pp. 279-293. (Mixed methods) Example •Smets, M., Morris, T., & Greenwood, R. (2012). “From practice to field: A multi-level model of practice driven institutional change,” Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 877-904; best article award 2012 by the Academy of Management Journal. •Ringberg, Torsten, Gaby Odekerken-Schröder and Glenn L. Christensen, (2007) “A cultural models approach to segmenting consumer recovery expectations,” in Journal of Marketing, Vol.71 (July), pp. 194-214. Complementary Reading •Alvesson, Mats and Jörgen Sandberg (2013). Constructing research questions: Doing interesting research. Sage: Los Angeles. •Huff, A. S. 1999. Writing for scholarly publication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. •Pratima B. and Corley, K. 2011. From the editors: “The coming of age for qualitative research,” Academy of Management Journal, 2011, Vol. 54, No. 2, p. 233-237 •Starbuck, William (1999) “Fussy Professor Starbuck's Cookbook of Handy-Dandy Prescriptions for Ambitious Academic Authors or Why I Hate Passive Verbs and Love My Word Processor” ;http://people.stern.nyu.edu/wstarbuc/Writing/Fussy.htm http://people.stern.nyu.edu/wstarbuc/Writing/Fussy.htm
|